12/13/2023 0 Comments Google speedtest web![]() ![]() Basically it is the time it takes your browser to start receiving information after it has requested it from the server. Time to first byte (TTFB) is the measurement of the responsiveness of a web server. You can both test the speed of your server and measure your CDN performance. ![]() Verifying that your CDN is loading the correct assets quicklyīefore running a website speed test it is important to understand a few concepts behind how these tools work so that you can better analyze the data and then optimize your site accordingly.Utilizing different browsers to ensure that load times and user experience is similar across all.Checking load speeds using servers in various countries.Analyzing total load times, page sizes, and request count.Detecting render-blocking JavaScript/CSS. ![]() Determining whether certain images need to be compressed.Verifying all scripts on your site are minified.Pinpointing which site assets are causing slow load times.Here are just a few of the common ways websites speed test tools are used: What can a website speed test help you analyze? Google's ranking algorithm wants your site to load in less than a second. You can take advantage of the many free website speed test tools available out there to achieve optimal performance. As discussed in our content delivery network guide, faster loading websites can benefit from higher SEO rankings, higher conversion rates, lower bounce rates, longer visitor duration on site, better overall user experience, and engagement. The speed of a website is critical to its success. Website speed test with Chrome extensions.What can a website speed test help you analyze?.You could also drop the discussion and simply make sure that those images are optimized. And our extension is unable to convert those images automatically, because of reasons. The reporting tools seem correct: Your images are lacking. ![]() There is no debate needed on the fact that WebP is not supported by all tools.īut are you 100% confident about the question I raised earlier? Is the report actually about the images replaced by this extension, or is your site simply shipped with images that are not optimized yet for WebP because they are using wrong opacity or are broken? I would invest my time really in that first, because by scanning your HTML I can see dozens of images that need to be optimized. If you are not a developer, please accept the fact that WebP is not covered by all browsers, hence also not covered by all reporting tools. If you are a developer, please get technical on this, because I don't understand what you are aiming for. I get the feeling that you are pushing for a solution that is impossible to create. The synthetic test you talk about does not apply to solutions like these. However, because it is a custom-made solution, it is logical to assume that some reporting tools that do not support such a custom-made solution will report things in a wrong way. The extension works (well?) and serves its purpose. I'm not sure if this belongs to this extension anymore. I am going to close this issue now because it seems there is no issue with the extension itself, but more with how to interpret the results from the external tools. You can convert these images manually to the proper format (JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, or still WebP). The answer is most likely that these images are either partially corrupted or incompatible with WebP (for instance because of incompatible alpha-transparency or something else). And the next logical question would be is why they are not picked up by this extension. My bet is that the tools are actually complaining about all of the other images that are not picked up this extension. However, because the images that are handled by this extension are not containing any path to the original image anymore (scan the HTML source for tags to see what I mean here), it is unlikely that these external tests are complaining about the images picked up by this extension. However, this custom solution is custom - it is not reckognized in any of the extensions. The last option is the reason why you use this extension. The reason is simple: Either you create a solution where all images are replaced for all browsers (including the ones that do not support WebP, hence breaking images in non-WebP browsers), or you create a custom solution for supporting WebP-images in WebP-browsers and non-WebP-images in non-WebP-images. It is corect: External tests do not pick up on the WebP images created by this extension. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |